Now bharat instead of India, political turmoil over President's invitation to G20 guests

Parliament Session: As the date of the special session of Parliament is getting closer, the market of speculations is also heating up. No one is aware of what the government is going to do in the special session. Meanwhile, a tweet has come from Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, in which he has told that in the dinner organized in honor of the G-20 conference, President of India is written instead of President of India.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh wrote in his tweet that this news is really true. In the invitation sent by Rashtrapati Bhavan for the G-20 dinner to be held on September 9, President of India has been written instead of President of India. If we read Article 1 of the Constitution, then it is written in it that Bharat, which is India, will be a group of states. The Congress leader wrote that now even the group of states is in danger.

So the news is indeed true.

Rashtrapati Bhawan has sent out an invite for a G20 dinner on Sept 9th in the name of 'President of Bharat' instead of the usual 'President of India'.

Now, Article 1 in the Constitution can read: “Bharat, that was India, shall be a Union of States.”…

— Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) September 5, 2023

Invitation letter has been sent

The Central Government has called a special session of Parliament from 18 to 22 September. During this, it has been said to discuss the topics related to Amrit Kaal. However, no definite agenda has come to the fore yet. This is the reason why different types of talks are happening. During the special session, there are speculations that bills or proposals like One Country One Election, Women's Reservation Bill, Bharat instead of India can be introduced.

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma also tweeted on Tuesday and wrote that Republic of India, it is a matter of happiness and pride that our country is rapidly moving towards Amritkal.

Will the name of India change?

If we talk about the name of India and Bharat, then the discussion is going on that wherever the word India is used in the constitution, it will now be changed to Bharat. Discussion regarding this has been going on for the last few days. First of all, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat had said that the name of our country has been Bharat for a long time, hence it should not be called India.

REPUBLIC OF BHARAT - happy and proud that our civilisation is marching ahead boldly towards AMRIT KAAL

— Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) September 5, 2023

Apart from these, Rajya Sabha MP Harnath Singh Yadav had appealed that this word is a symbol of slavery, hence India should be written in its place in the Constitution. This issue was raised in the House by some MPs even during the monsoon session of Parliament. In such a situation, this is the reason why it is also believed that a decision related to this can be taken in the special session of Parliament.