Sanjay Raut found guilty in Rs 100 crore defamation case, sentenced to 15 days in jail

Sanjay Raut News: Shiv Sena Uddhav Thackeray faction leader Sanjay Raut has been convicted in a defamation case filed by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya's wife Medha Somaiya. The Mazgaon Court today pronounced its verdict in the case, sentencing Sanjay Raut to 15 days in jail and also imposing a fine of Rs 25,000.

What is the whole matter?

The controversy started when Sanjay Raut alleged that Kirit and Medha Somaiya were involved in a scam of Rs 100 crore by misusing funds for toilet construction. Following these allegations by Raut, Medha Somaiya filed a complaint against Sanjay Raut, in which she claimed defamation of Rs 100 crore.

Medha Somaiya told the court that the allegations leveled by Raut were not only baseless but also damaging to her image. She also said that Raut's statement publicly humiliated her and her husband.

Court's decision

The Metropolitan Magistrate 25th Court, Mazgaon convicted Sanjay Raut after a hearing today. The court said that Raut's allegations were clearly defamatory. Along with this, he has been sentenced under Section 500 of the IPC.

Medha Somaiya's argument

Medha Somaiya also said in her complaint to the court that she was shocked to hear Raut's allegations, as she and her husband have always worked with transparency. She said that Raut's statements have hurt the dignity of her and her family. Medha saw the matter not only as a personal insult, but also called it the result of political malice.

Political reaction

This case of Sanjay Raut is not only a symbol of personal defamation, but also of growing tension and vengeance in Indian politics. There is already a bitterness between the BJP and the Shiv Sena, and this incident provides a new twist to this political dispute. This decision against Raut has further challenged his image, which has already been surrounded by controversies.

Conclusion

This defamation case against Sanjay Raut not only affects his personal image, but it is also politically important. This decision has shown how serious the game of rhetoric and allegations can be in Indian politics. Now it remains to be seen whether this case will add more intensity to the political battle, or it will end up as a personal dispute.