Sharad Pawar refuses Z+ security, even rejects government vehicle - Source

Maharashtra Politics / Sharad Pawar refuses Z+ security, even rejects government vehicle - Source

Maharashtra Politics - Sharad Pawar refuses Z+ security, even rejects government vehicle - Source

Sharad Pawar News: Recently, the central government had issued an order to provide Z+ security to Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Chandra Pawar. However, after this order, a shocking news came—Sharad Pawar has refused to take this high-level security. This development raises many questions about his security needs and political strategies. Let's look deeper into this matter and understand what could be the reason behind this decision of Sharad Pawar.

Refusal to deploy security personnel

According to sources, Sharad Pawar not only rejected the offer of Z+ security, but he has also refused to deploy security personnel inside his house. Apart from this, he also decided not to use the government vehicle and refused to seat security personnel in his personal car. Pawar has proposed to the central government that if security is to be provided, it should be limited outside his house and not in his private place.

Sharad Pawar's statement

Sharad Pawar expressed his opinion on the issue of Z+ security, saying that the security being given to him by the central government could be a way to gather authentic information about him. This statement indicates that Pawar's eyes are not only on his own security, but also on the larger picture of politics. Maharashtra is due to have assembly elections later this year, and Pawar is focusing on his political strategies for these elections.

Features of Z+ security

Z+ security means that a person is provided security by a team of 55 armed personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). This security classification represents the highest level of VIP protection. It is followed by 'Z', 'Y+', 'Y', and 'X' security classes. Z+ security includes multiple layers of security and highly trained security personnel, who are capable of dealing with any emergency.

Political and security perspective

Sharad Pawar's denial of Z+ security could also be a political strategy. He may see this as a symbolic move, sending a message to his supporters that he is self-reliant about his security and stands by his principles despite political pressure. Moreover, this move may also send a message to his political opponents that they can make the issue of security an important election issue.

Conclusion

Sharad Pawar's decision to turn down Z+ security is not just a personal choice but may be part of a subtle political and security strategy. This move not only reflects his security priorities but also clarifies his political outlook and his position in the context of the upcoming elections. Only time will tell what impact this decision will have on the political landscape, but for now it is clear that Pawar's strategy may be an important step towards further strengthening his political presence.