The President should not inaugurate the new Parliament House - Rahul Gandhi

New Parliament Building: There has been a ruckus on the inauguration of the new Parliament building. Now Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said a big thing. He said that the President should inaugurate the new building, not the Prime Minister. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will inaugurate the new Parliament House on 28 May. The Congress has called the new building a vanity project of the Prime Minister. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla met Prime Minister Modi and invited him to inaugurate the new building. Opposition leaders are questioning the inauguration of the new building by the PM… Why was the PM invited for the inauguration? The PM is the head of the government and not the legislature. The building has been constructed with public money, the PM is behaving as if it was built with the money of his 'friend'. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi asked why the Prime Minister would inaugurate the new Parliament House? Lok Sabha Speaker or Rajya Sabha Speaker should inaugurate it.

Naya Bhavan PM's vanity project

After the announcement of the inauguration of the new building, Congress spokesperson Jairam Ramesh shared the picture of the PM with a safety cap. In the tweet, he said that the only architects, designers and laborers who will inaugurate the new building on May 28. It is clear from the picture that this is his personal project.

President should inaugurate the new Parliament House

However, disqualified MP from Parliament Rahul Gandhi is saying that it should be inaugurated by the President.

Seating arrangement for 888 members in the new Parliament House

888 members can sit in the new Parliament House. About 543 members can sit in the present Lok Sabha building and 250 members can sit in the Rajya Sabha building. It is believed that the number of members in the Parliament will be increased in the coming times. The current Parliament House was built in 1927, which is now going to be about 100 years old. The Lok Sabha Secretariat said that according to the current requirements, lack of space was felt. There was also a lack of convenient seating arrangements for the MPs in both the Houses, due to which the work was also being affected.