Tu-tu-main-main in Govind Singh Dotasara and Sikar Rajendra Pareek- watch video

Rajasthan News: Congress State President (Laxmangarh MLA) Govind Singh Dotasara and Sikar MLA (Congress) Rajendra Pareek got into an argument. Both the leaders came face to face on the issue of drainage of water. Dotasara accused Pareek of taking the side of the officers. The debate between the two leaders continued for about 10 minutes and from the collector present in the collectorate auditorium to the in-charge minister Shakuntala Rawat kept watching. Both the leaders kept instructing each other to stay within the limits. Seeing the progress of the matter, Shakuntala Rawat interrupted Pareek.

Minister in-charge Shakuntala Rawat was taking a meeting regarding budget announcements at Sikar Collectorate Auditorium at around 11.30 am on Monday. Laxmangarh MLA Govind Singh Dotasara sought answers from the officials regarding the Nawalgarh road drainage and Nawalgarh road culvert four-lane project.

'Take care of your Laxmangarh assembly constituency'

Dotasara told former minister Pareek not to take the side of the officials. In such a situation, there was a conflict between the two. The atmosphere got so heated that Rajendra Pareek even told Dotasara to take care of his Laxmangarh constituency.

Dotasara instructed to stay within limits

Dotasara said that my residence is on Nawalgarh Road in Sikar. That's when I get in trouble. Pareek said that the Chairman and I personally monitor the ongoing development works in the city till 12-12 in the night. On this, Dotasara asked Pareek to stay within his limits.

Now read who said what...

Dotasara said to Pareek – You stay within your limits.

Pareek said angrily - you should be ashamed.

Dotasara again said – You stay within your limits. You have not taken the contract for Sikar. Will it be made or not.

Pareek said - Shut up man. On this, the minister intervened and said that you are so senior.

Dotasara said - He is senior. They became a party by force.

Dotasara lashed out at PWD officers

When in-charge minister Shakuntala Rawat, who came to intervene, tried to settle the dispute between the two, Pareek said that don't hold a meeting with such people. The argument between Dotasara and Pareek went on for about 10 minutes. Both were pacified after mediation. After this the meeting resumed. Dotasara told the PWD officials on the Nawalgarh Pulia Fourlane that you have told something else in the PPT, while you are saying something else in the meeting.

Railway officials should have a meeting

In such a situation, what should be taken as the basis? The budget has arrived in February, but till now you have not been able to decide how to do the work. There is now 4 months left in the election. What answer will we give to the public? Dotasara said in the meeting that I have 101 percent confidence that PWD will not be able to do this work. Rajendra Pareek said on this that there should be a meeting between the officials of the department and the railways at the state level. Only then can it work.

The chairman left in the middle of the meeting

In the meeting, Dotasara Sikar Municipal Council Chairman was also seen getting entangled with Jeevan Khan. Dotasara said that despite our government, the condition of Piprali Road and Nawalgarh Road is bad. People are living the life of hell there. No work is being done there for one and a half months. Along with Nawalgarh Pulia, Jagmalpura bypass, sewerage work is also going on at a slow pace. In response, Jeevan Khan said that the city council is working continuously. There was a scuffle between the two for about a minute. Then the city council chairman left in the middle of the meeting.

Money spent on road construction

In the meeting, public representatives said that the meeting of the District Mineral Foundation Trust (DMFT) is not held for two years. Neemkathana MLA Suresh Modi said that 75% of DMFT money comes from my area. Despite this, that money is not spent in development works in my area. On this, in-charge minister Shakuntala Rawat said that the money can be spent anywhere in the district. It has also happened in Neemkathana area. Apart from this, DMFT money has also been spent in the Medical College in Sikar. Apart from this, the road works of Dasa Ki Dhani, Jaipur Road, Piprali Road were discussed in the meeting.

Dotasara said – Pareek sahab is my elder

PCC Chief Govind Singh Dotasara met the media after the meeting. During this, he said on the dispute with Pareek – We have no personal ill-will with any officer or leader. We all sit together and eat food. Work together in an organization. Pareek Sahab is my elder. I greet by touching his feet. But when talking about the budget announcement, he is taking it personally and saying that you are blaming my officer. They may have had some misunderstanding. I will clear their misunderstanding.

There may be differences, but there is no difference of mind

Dotasara said that Pareek is also making a lot of efforts for the development of Sikar. No one has authority. He only belongs to himself and belongs to his job. If an officer gets a job somewhere against someone's desire, it does not mean that he is doing wrong. Dotasara said that the public will get a message from today's dialogue that where we need to clash on public issues, we clash there. There can be difference of opinion about something but there is no difference of mind between us.

CM has given maximum budget to Sikar. When the public will evaluate us, they will only see how the government has given good governance. He kept whatever thoughts he had in the meeting. Dotasara said that whatever work is done, it should be of quality. Because this money is not our money but the money of the public.

There was only dialogue between the two

In-charge minister Shakuntala Rawat said that many works are such that it is necessary to get approval from the central government. But the central government sends back the file by putting one point or the other, so there is a delay in making the budget announcement a reality. On the dispute between Dotasara-Pareek, Rawat said that it was not an argument, but both were discussing among themselves. If such a dialogue seems controversial to anyone, it is not controversial.