Vikrant Shekhawat : Sep 20, 2024, 11:19 AM
Karnataka High Court: A controversial comment by Karnataka High Court judge B Sreesha Nanda has sparked a new discussion. He had described Bengaluru's Muslim-dominated area Gori Palya as Pakistan, after which this video went viral on social media. Now the Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the issue, which shows the seriousness of the matter.Context of the judge's commentB Sreesha Nanda had said during a hearing on August 28 that the law and order situation in Gori Palya is not good. He also said, "There are 10 people in an auto here and the law does not apply here. The area from Gori Palya to Mysore flyover is in Pakistan, not India." This comment sparked objection from many people and after that it spread on social media.Supreme Court's responseSupreme Court Chief Justice DY Chandrachud took cognizance of this comment and said that media reports have drawn attention to the matter. He said that the court will issue guidelines in this matter and a report will be sought from the Karnataka High Court judge.The CJI has requested the judge to take directions from the Chief Justice of the High Court and submit a report. He has been given two days for this process, and the next hearing will be on September 25.Constitutional and social impactThis case has raised many questions from the constitutional and social point of view. Such statements made by the judge not only affect the image of the judicial system, but it also puts a question mark on social harmony and tolerance. The effect of such comments can create tension between communities, which is detrimental to a democratic society.ConclusionThe controversial remarks of the Karnataka High Court judge have not only given rise to debate within the judiciary, but have also made it a part of social dialogue. The Supreme Court taking suo motu cognizance is an indication that the courts are taking their responsibilities seriously. Now it remains to be seen what is the conclusion in the hearing to be held on September 25 and whether the judge expresses regret for his remarks or not. This case will definitely affect the traditions and values of the judicial system of India.